Affective responses to dance
Affective responses to dance
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.008
复制
发表时间：
2016-07-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Gomila, Antoni
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christensen, Julia F.;Pollick, Frank E.;Gomila, Antoni
这项工作的目的是描述观察者在观看舞蹈动作时产生情感体验的机制。在一系列独立实验中使用了来自标准化刺激库的203个舞蹈刺激。获得了以下测量：(I)97名舞蹈天真参与者的情感反应的主观测量(Likert量表评分、访谈)；以及(Ii)刺激的物理参数(运动能量、亮度)和刺激中所代表的动作(圆度、印象度)的客观测量。结果表明：(I)受试者对感觉到的情感和感知到的情感的评价不同，(Ii)感觉和感知的效价，但与刺激的物理参数(运动能量和亮度)无关，(Iii)姿势形状的圆形与体验更积极的情绪有关(被评估的3个圆形中有1个对积极情绪评级有明显影响，而第二个达到趋势水平显著)，(Iv)更令人印象深刻的动作导致更积极的情感反应，(V)舞蹈通过其在一些人中引发的意象和自传体记忆引发情感体验，(6)视频刺激的物理参数与美感、喜好、趣味的审美评分呈微弱负相关。本方法的新颖性有两个方面：(I)对多种情感诱导机制的评估，以及(Ii)单一标准刺激集的使用。这一方法的结果支持了以前和现在的研究结果。结果被讨论关于在经验美学和情感神经科学领域的当前文献。(C)2016爱思唯尔B.V.保留所有权利。
The objective of the present work was the characterization of mechanisms by which affective experiences are elicited in observers when watching dance movements. A total of 203 dance stimuli from a normed stimuli library were used in a series of independent experiments. The following measures were obtained: (i) subjective measures of 97 dance-naive participants' affective responses (Likert scale ratings, interviews); and (ii) objective measures of the physical parameters of the stimuli (motion energy, luminance), and of the movements represented in the stimuli (roundedness, impressiveness). Results showed that (i) participants' ratings of felt and perceived affect differed, (ii) felt and perceived valence but not arousal ratings correlated with physical parameters of the stimuli (motion energy and luminance), (iii) roundedness in posture shape was related to the experience of more positive emotion than edgy shapes (1 of 3 assessed rounded shapes showed a clear effect on positiveness ratings while a second reached trend level significance), (iv) more impressive movements resulted in more positive affective responses, (v) dance triggered affective experiences through the imagery and autobiographical memories it elicited in some people, and (vi) the physical parameters of the video stimuli correlated only weakly and negatively with the aesthetics ratings of beauty, liking and interest. The novelty of the present approach was twofold; (i) the assessment of multiple affect-inducing mechanisms, and (ii) the use of one single normed stimulus set. The results from this approach lend support to both previous and present findings. Results are discussed with regards to current literature in the field of empirical aesthetics and affective neuroscience. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.