Generalizability of treatment studies utilizing solicited patients.

Generalizability of treatment studies utilizing solicited patients.
复制标题

利用招募的患者进行治疗研究的普遍性。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-006x.54.1.68
复制
发表时间:
1986
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
I. Elkin
I. Elkin
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Krupnick;T. Shea;I. Elkin

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管近年来临床研究人员越来越多地转向媒体广告,以获得足够大的和同质的样本用于心理治疗和精神药理学治疗结果研究,但尚不清楚在多大程度上可以从征集到传统转诊的患者人群。为了阐明这一主题,我们回顾了14项比较在临床环境中接受治疗或研究的征集和非征集患者组的研究。研究结果表明,如果进行了充分的筛选,就治疗前肿瘤学而言,有可能产生相对可比的征集和非征集患者样本。尽管现有数据表明,这些组之间的治疗应答也可能相似,但这些数据过于有限,无法得出基于征集患者样本的治疗疗效结果的普遍性结论。治疗结果的差异发现两个变量(存在的沉淀物和疾病的持续时间)的可能影响进行了讨论。
Despite the fact that clinical researchers have turned increasingly to media advertisements in recent years to obtain sufficiently large and homogeneous samples for psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatment outcome studies, it has not been clear to what extent it is possible to generalize from solicited to traditionally referred patient populations. To shed light on this topic, 14 studies that compared solicited and nonsoliticed patient groups treated or studied in clinical settings were reviewed. Findings suggest that it may be possible to generate relatively comparable samples of solicited and nonsolicited patients, in terms of pretreatment symptomatology, provided there is adequate screening. Although the existing data suggest that treatment response may also be similar across these groups, these data are too limited to permit conclusions regarding generalizability of treatment efficacy findings based on solicited patient samples. Possible implications for treatment outcome of differences found on two variables (presence of precipitants and duration of illness) are discussed.
主动与非主动单相抑郁女性门诊患者的治疗结果。
DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.1.134
发表时间: 1984
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Last,CG;Thase,ME;Hersen,M;Bellack,AS;Himmelhoch,JM
通讯作者: Himmelhoch,JM