Collapsing and pinching under a lower curvature bound
Collapsing and pinching under a lower curvature bound
复制标题
DOI:
10.2307/2946563
复制
发表时间:
1991-03
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Takao Yamaguchi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takao Yamaguchi
In this paper we are concerned with collapsing phenomena and pinching problems of Riemannian manifolds whose sectional curvatures are uniformly bounded from below. For a positive integer n and for D > 0, let X/ be the set of compact Riemannian n-manifolds M with sectional curvatures KM ? -1 and diameters diam(M) < D. By the weak compactness theorem of Gromov [GLP], X' is relatively compact in the set of compact metric spaces with respect to the Hausdorff distance. Furthermore Gromov proved in [G2] that the sum of Betti numbers of any element in X is uniformly bounded in terms of the given constants. These results suggest that X/ is an object of study on which we could develop some geometry and topology. In fact, when volumes are uniformly bounded away from zero, the following results are known. Let #(v) be the subset of X/ with volume vol(M) ? v. Grove and Petersen [GP1] proved that the set of homotopy types of elements in 4(v) is finite. (Related results are in [Y2].) For pinching problems Otsu, Shiohama and the author ([OSY], [Y3]) obtained some differential sphere theorems in the class X(v). According to a recent paper [GPW], if n # 3,4, then (v) contains at most finitely many diffeomorphism types. Let Mi (i = 1, 2,...) be a convergent sequence in A, and X be the limit of them. We say that Mi collapses to X if the Hausdorff dimension of X is less than n. By the volume condition, no collapsing occurs in 4(v). From this point of view it is quite natural to ask what collapsing phenomena occur and what types of pinching theorems hold in the class X/. In this situation it seems difficult to determine the singularities of X (some examples are given in Section 1). In this paper we study collapsing phenomena in the case when X is a Riemannian manifold and establish a pinching theorem. For a Riemannian manifold M we denote by inj(M) the injectivity radius of M. When N is written in place of X and the metric of N is normalized, our