Remaking IO: Semiotic Remediation in the Design Process

Remaking IO: Semiotic Remediation in the Design Process
复制标题

重塑 IO:设计过程中的符号修复

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Paul Prior
Paul Prior
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Paul Prior

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

随着新技术重新组织我们的书写工具和实践,改变我们的符号学景观,我们对识字的经验和理解正在迅速转变。越来越多的研究(例如,Baldry和Thibault,2006年; Bolter和Grusin,1999年; Kress和货车Leeuwen,2001年; Lemke,2002年; Manovich,2001年)已经开始探索理解多模态工件的方法。然而,制作新媒体的现场和中介做法受到的关注有限(然而,见Johnson-Eilola,2005年)。本章探讨了多媒体制作在艺术与设计计划在伊利诺伊大学,专注于两个艺术与设计教授和他们的研究生研究助理的过程中补救(在博尔特和格鲁辛的,1999年,感觉)一个基于网络的艺术对象称为IO,一个交互式网站混合文字,声音和图像。扩展设计过程的早期分析(Suchman and Trigg,1993; Tang,1988)以及关于手势和谈话的元语用研究(例如,Goodwin,2000; Hanks,1990;哈维兰,2000,2007; LeBaron和Streeck,2000; Ochs,Quebby,and冈萨雷斯,1994),本章的分析重点是这一群体在从事谈话,绘图,列出,数据输入、编程和手势(特别是在屏幕和纸张上)。
Our experiences with, and understandings of, literacy are rapidly shifting as new technologies reorganize our inscriptional tools and practices and alter our semiotic landscape. A growing body of research (for example, Baldry and Thibault, 2006; Bolter and Grusin, 1999; Kress and Van Leeuwen, 2001; Lemke, 2002; Manovich, 2001) has begun exploring ways to understand multimodal artifacts. However, the situated and mediated practices of producing new media have received limited attention (see, however, Johnson-Eilola, 2005). This chapter examines multimedia production in an Art and Design program at the University of Illinois, focusing on two Art and Design professors and two of their graduate student research assistants in the process of remediating (in Bolter and Grusin’s, 1999, sense) a web-based art object called IO, an interactive website mixing words, sounds, and images. Extending earlier analyses of the design process (Suchman and Trigg, 1993; Tang, 1988) and metapragmatic work on gestures and talk (for example, Goodwin, 2000; Hanks, 1990; Haviland, 2000, 2007; LeBaron and Streeck, 2000; Ochs, Jacoby, and Gonzales, 1994), the analysis in this chapter focuses on the semiotic remediation involved in the design production work of this group as they engaged in talk, drawing, listing, data entry, programming, and gesturing (especially over screens and paper).