BeppoSAX Observations of the Young Pulsar in the Kes 75 Supernova Remnant

BeppoSAX Observations of the Young Pulsar in the Kes 75 Supernova Remnant
复制标题

DOI:
10.1086/340976
复制
发表时间:
2002-08
期刊:
The Astrophysical Journal
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Mereghetti;R. Bandiera;F. Bocchino;G. Israel
S. Mereghetti;R. Bandiera;F. Bocchino;G. Israel
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Mereghetti;R. Bandiera;F. Bocchino;G. Israel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们提出的年轻的X射线脉冲星PSR J1846-0258,最近在复合超新星遗迹Kes 75的中心发现的BeppoSAX观测的结果。脉冲星(加星云)光谱符合吸收功率定律,光子指数αph = 2.16 ± 0.15,NH =(4.7 ± 0.8)× 1022 cm-2,未吸收通量~3.9 × 10-11 ergscm-2s-1(2-10 keV)。通过将间隔2周的两次观察结果结合起来,我们已经能够获得自旋周期的精确测量值(P = 324.818968 ± 0.000006 ms)。当与先前的测量值结合时,该值不能通过具有规范制动指数n = 3的平滑频率演变来拟合。假设没有毛刺和/或明显的计时噪声,则制动指数为n = 1.86 ± 0.08,假设初始周期较短,则脉冲星的年龄约为1700年,比简单估计的τ = P/2 = 723年更接近超新星遗迹的年龄。其他可能的可能性包括小故障的存在,并导致广泛的可接受的年龄范围。例如,如果故障发生在MJD 51500附近,我们得到的n在1.8-2.5的范围内,而对于1993年10月至1999年3月之间的故障,我们只能得到n > 1.89的下限。
We present the results of BeppoSAX observations of the young X-ray pulsar PSR J1846-0258, recently discovered at the center of the composite supernova remnant Kes 75. The pulsar (plus nebula) spectrum can be fitted by an absorbed power law with photon index αph = 2.16 ± 0.15, NH = (4.7 ± 0.8) × 1022 cm-2, and unabsorbed flux ~3.9 × 10-11 ergs cm-2 s-1 (2-10 keV). By joining two observations taken at an interval of 2 weeks, we have been able to obtain a precise measurement of the spin period (P = 324.818968 ± 0.000006 ms). This value, when combined with previous measurements, cannot be fitted by a smooth frequency evolution with a canonical braking index n = 3. With the hypothesis of no glitches and/or significant timing noise, the braking index would be n = 1.86 ± 0.08, and assuming a short initial period, the pulsar age would be ~1700 yr, closer to that of the supernova remnant than the simple estimate τ = P/2 = 723 yr. Other likely possibilities involve the presence of glitches and lead to a wide range of acceptable ages. For example, we obtain n in the range 1.8-2.5 if a glitch occurred near MJD 51500, while for a glitch between 1993 October and 1999 March, we can only get a lower limit of n > 1.89.