Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7
复制
发表时间：
2019-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Hurst, Samia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FitzGerald, Chloe;Martin, Angela;Hurst, Samia
背景：内隐偏见存在于普通人群和各个领域的专业人员中，它们可能导致歧视。许多干预措施被用来减少内隐偏见。然而，不确定性仍然是他们的effectiveness.Methods：我们进行了一项系统的审查，通过搜索ERIC，PUBMED和PSYCIDFO的同行评议的研究之间进行的成年人2005年5月和2015年4月，测试干预措施，旨在减少内隐偏见，测量结果使用内隐联想测试（IAT）或足够类似的方法。一些技术，如与他人的观点，似乎没有成效，至少在短期内隐性偏见减少，而其他技术，如接触反刻板印象的例子，更有希望。许多这些干预措施缺乏可靠的数据。结论：因此，当涉及到旨在减少偏见的计划时，建议谨慎。这并没有削弱实施广泛的结构和体制改革的理由，这些改革有多重理由。
Background: Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness.Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods.Results: 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others' perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions.Conclusions: Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.