The use of protest event data in comparative research: cross-national comparability, sampling methods and robustness
The use of protest event data in comparative research: cross-national comparability, sampling methods and robustness
复制标题
抗议事件数据在比较研究中的使用：跨国可比性、抽样方法和稳健性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Koopmans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Koopmans
本章讨论了一些关于基于报纸的抗议事件数据的问题和使用的核心问题，参考了在西欧新社会运动（nsm）发展的比较研究项目背景下收集的经验。该项目于1988年开始，最近结束。主要合作者有Hanspeter Kriesi， Jan Willem Duyvendak， Marco Giugni和本文作者。收集了1975年至1989年期间四个西欧国家（德国、法国、荷兰和瑞士）的抗议事件（非国家运动和其他运动，不包括罢工，见下文）的数据。德国和荷兰也收集了1965年至1974年的数据，尽管样本较小。最近，数据集已经扩展到包括1975年至1989年英国的抗议事件，以及1977年至1989年西班牙的抗议事件（同样基于较小的样本）（见Koopmans 1996a）最初，该项目的研究设计相当传统，没有考虑到抗议事件数据的收集。这个想法是为了收集数据
This chapter discusses some of the central issues concerning the problems and uses of newspaper-based protest event data, referring to experiences gathered in the context of a comparative research project on the development of new social movements (NSMs) in Western Europe. The project started in 1988 and was recently concluded. Principal collaborators were Hanspeter Kriesi, Jan Willem Duyvendak, Marco Giugni and the present author. Data were gathered on protest events (of NSMs and other movements, with the exclusion of labor strikes, see below) in four Western European countries (Germany, France, the Netherlands and Switzerland) for the period from 1975 to 1989. For Germany and the Netherlands, data were also gathered for the years 1965 through 1974, albeit based on a smaller sample. Recently, the data set has been extended to include protest events in Great Britain between 1975 and 1989, and in Spain (also based on a smaller sample) between 1977 and 1989 (see Koopmans 1996a).6 Originally, the research design of the project was rather conventional and did not envisage the gathering of protest event data. The idea was to gather data on