Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects

Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/qshc.2003.008425
复制
发表时间:
2004-10-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Grober, E
Grober, E
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lingard, L;Espin, S;Grober, E

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:无效的团队沟通往往是医疗差错的根源。本研究的目的是描述在手术室(OR)的通信故障的特点,并对其影响进行分类。这项研究是一个更大的项目,以开发一个团队的清单,以提高沟通的OR.Methods:训练有素的观察员记录了90小时的观察,在48个外科手术。94名团队成员参加了麻醉(16名工作人员,6名研究员,3名住院医生),外科(14名工作人员,8名研究员,13名住院医生,3名办事员)和护理(31名工作人员)。记录程序相关的通信事件的现场说明进行了分析,使用的框架,认为内容,受众,目的和交流的场合。一个沟通失败被定义为一个事件,是有缺陷的一个或多个这些dimensions.Results:421沟通事件,其中129被归类为沟通失败。失败的类型包括:时机不佳的“回避”(45.7%);信息缺失或不准确的“内容”(35.7%);问题未得到解决的“目的”(24.0%);以及关键人物被排除在外的“受众”(20.9%)。36.4%的故障导致系统流程,包括效率低下,团队紧张,资源浪费,变通办法,延迟,病人的不便和程序error.Conclusion:在OR的通信故障表现出一组常见的问题,在可见的影响。它们发生在大约30%的团队交流中,其中三分之一导致认知负荷增加,中断常规和增加手术室紧张局势,从而危及患者安全。
Background: Ineffective team communication is frequently at the root of medical error. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of communication failures in the operating room ( OR) and to classify their effects. This study was part of a larger project to develop a team checklist to improve communication in the OR.Methods: Trained observers recorded 90 hours of observation during 48 surgical procedures. Ninety four team members participated from anesthesia ( 16 staff, 6 fellows, 3 residents), surgery ( 14 staff, 8 fellows, 13 residents, 3 clerks), and nursing ( 31 staff). Field notes recording procedurally relevant communication events were analysed using a framework which considered the content, audience, purpose, and occasion of a communication exchange. A communication failure was defined as an event that was flawed in one or more of these dimensions.Results: 421 communication events were noted, of which 129 were categorized as communication failures. Failure types included "occasion'' (45.7% of instances) where timing was poor; "content'' (35.7%) where information was missing or inaccurate, "purpose'' (24.0%) where issues were not resolved, and "audience'' (20.9%) where key individuals were excluded. 36.4% of failures resulted in visible effects on system processes including inefficiency, team tension, resource waste, workaround, delay, patient inconvenience and procedural error.Conclusion: Communication failures in the OR exhibited a common set of problems. They occurred in approximately 30% of team exchanges and a third of these resulted in effects which jeopardized patient safety by increasing cognitive load, interrupting routine, and increasing tension in the OR.