A controlled field trial of group versus individual cognitive-behavioural training for relapse prevention
A controlled field trial of group versus individual cognitive-behavioural training for relapse prevention
复制标题
DOI：
10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.91811275.x
复制
发表时间：
1996-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Venesoen, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Graham, K;Annis, HM;Venesoen, P
结果提出了一个随机现场试验比较两个善后制度，即个人与团体交付的结构化复发预防方法。两个成瘾治疗方案（一个12步26天的住宅计划，其他艺术晚会团体咨询计划）实施结构化的复发预防，无论是团体或个人的格式作为前三个月的善后工作的一部分。流程测量（例如出勤率、客户满意度）表明，团体和个人形式在两个地点都非常成功地交付。两个项目的12个月随访率为74%，12个月随访时的饮酒和药物使用率大大低于进入治疗时的使用率。然而，在任何酒精或药物使用措施上，个人和团体交付的结果没有显着差异。只有一个心理社会结果的措施（社会支持的朋友在一个月的后续行动）显示了显着差异的格式，它有利于组格式。这些发现为未来的研究提出了一些重要的方向。
Results are presented of a randomized field trial comparing two aftercare regimes, namely individual versus group delivery of a structured relapse prevention approach. Two addictions treatment programs (one a 12-Step 26-day residential program, the other art evening group counselling program) implemented structured relapse prevention in either group or individual format as part of the first three months of aftercare. Process measures (e.g. attendance, client satisfaction) indicated that both group and individual formats were delivered very successfully at both sites. Follow-up rate at 12 months across both programs was 74%, and drinking and drug use at the 12-month follow-up was substantially less than use at entry into treatment. However, there were no significant differences in outcomes between individual and group delivery on any of the alcohol or drug use measures. Only one psychosocial outcome measure (social support from friends at la-month follow-up) showed a significant difference for format and it favored the group format. These findings suggest some important directions for future research.