Two Fourteenth-Century Court Records From Jerusalem Concerning the Disposition of Slaves By Minors
Two Fourteenth-Century Court Records From Jerusalem Concerning the Disposition of Slaves By Minors
复制标题
耶路撒冷有关未成年人处置奴隶的两份 14 世纪法庭记录
DOI：
10.1163/157005882x00022
复制
发表时间：
1982
期刊：
影响因子：
0.2
通讯作者：
Donald P. Little
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Donald P. Little
除了三个法蒂玛和Mamliik文件出版的理查德J。Gottheil 1和Noberto Risciani在一本非常难以捉摸的书2中发表的十几份Mamluik文件，迄今为止，穆斯林中世纪的司法记录很少，即在奥斯曼人之前。因此，人们对中世纪穆斯林司法程序知之甚少，除了从文学资料中收集到的资料，一方面是adab和fiqh作品，这些作品旨在指导qddi的个人和职业生活，另一方面是历史作品，无论是编年史还是传记，它们记录了法官生活和活动的偶然数据。当然，作为文学来源，所有这些作品都有缺点;前者是因为它们似乎停留在理想而不是真实的，后者是因为它们被历史学家的选择和想象的棱镜过滤了。在这种情况下，最近在耶路撒冷的“尊贵禁地”4发现了一批伊斯兰文件，这是研究伊斯兰文化的一个重要事件。
OTHER than three Fatimid and Mamliik documents published by Richard J. H. Gottheil 1, and a dozen or so Mamluik documents published by Noberto Risciani in a very elusive book2, few judicial records from the Muslim Middle Ages, i.e. prior to the Ottomans, have so far come to light. In consequence little is known about medieval Muslim judicial procedure3 other than what can be gleaned from literary sources, from adab and fiqh works on the one hand, which were intended to guide the qddi in his personal and professional life, and, on the other hand, historical works, be they chronicles or biographies, which record occasional data on the lives and activities of judges. As literary sources all these works have drawbacks, of course; the former because they seem to dwell on the ideal rather than the real, and the latter because they are filtered through the prism of the historian's choice and imagination. This being the case, the recent discovery of a cache of Islamic documents in the Haram al-Sharif in Jerusalem4 constitutes an important event in the study of the Islamic