Categorization and metaphor understanding.
Categorization and metaphor understanding.
复制标题
分类和隐喻理解。
DOI：
10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.572
复制
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
GibbsJr,RW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GibbsJr,RW
GLucksberg和Keysar(1990)提出了隐喻理解的类包含模型。这一理论认为，隐喻不被理解为隐含的明喻，而是被视为包含类的陈述，其中隐喻的主题被分配到一个诊断性的特殊范畴，而隐喻的载体是该范畴的原型成员。作者认为，动词隐喻不是简单的临时性、临时性范畴的实例化，而是反映了长期记忆中预先存在的概念映射，这些概念映射是以隐喻的方式构建的。来自认知语言学、哲学和心理学的各种证据都支持这一论断。与格卢克斯伯格和凯撒的观点相反，本文还提出了支持默会概念隐喻在理解语篇中言语隐喻中的作用的证据。
Glucksberg and Keysar (1990) have proposed a class-inclusion model of metaphor comprehension. This theory suggests that metaphors are not understood as implicit similes but are seen as class-inclusion statements in which the topic of a metaphor is assigned to a diagnostic, ad hoc category, whereas the metaphor's vehicle is a prototypical member of that category. The author claims that verbal metaphors are not simply instantiations of temporary, ad hoc categories but reflect preexisting conceptual mappings in long-term memory that are metaphorically structured. Various evidence from cognitive linguistics, philosophy, and psychology are described in support of this claim. Evidence is also presented that supports, contrary to Glucksberg and Keysar's position, the role of tacit conceptual metaphors in the comprehension of verbal metaphors in discourse.