Anonymity and Place in Qualitative Inquiry
Anonymity and Place in Qualitative Inquiry
复制标题
匿名和定性调查中的地位
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Nespor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Nespor
本文考察了在试图使定性帐户中所代表的地方匿名的日常实践中嵌入的假设。匿名通常被视为一个伦理问题，但就像任何表征策略一样，它隐藏了关于世界上实体的本质以及我们与它们之间关系的假设。作者关注地点匿名化，认为假名的使用和对历史和地理信息识别的遗漏使研究报告与某些本体论假设、理论化模式和公共领域的整体结构保持一致。作者最后提出了在定性调查中重新思考地点和身份的方法。
This article examines assumptions embedded in the routine practice of trying to make the places represented in qualitative accounts anonymous. Anonymity is usually seen as an ethical issue, but like any representational strategy, it conceals assumptions about the nature of entities in the world and our relations with them. Focusing on place anonymization, the author argues that the use of pseudonyms and the omission of identifying historical and geographical information align research accounts with certain ontological assumptions, modes of theorizing, and corporate constructions of the public sphere. The author concludes by suggesting ways that place and identification can be rethought in qualitative inquiry.