Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.
Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.
复制标题
句子理解过程中的直接访问检索：来自 Sluicing 的证据。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.006
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
McElree,Brian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin,AndreaE;McElree,Brian
语言理解需要从语言形式中恢复意义，即使两者之间的映射是间接的。一个典型的例子是省略，省略的信息，随后理解没有明显的发音。省略的理解需要从记忆中提取先行词，而无需事先预测，这一特性使得原位提取研究成为可能（Martin & McElree，2008，2009）。在连词出现的情况下，冲洗或屈折短语省略呈现了一个测试案例，其中竞争先行词位置在句法上被许可，与大多数不相邻依赖的情况相反，包括动词短语省略。我们提出的速度准确性的权衡和眼动数据不一致的假设，检索是通过一个语法引导搜索，一个特定的变体搜索没有检查在过去的研究。所观察到的时程配置文件是一致的假设，即通过线索依赖的直接访问机制容易受到一般的记忆变量的前提。
Language comprehension requires recovering meaning from linguistic form, even when the mapping between the two is indirect. A canonical example is ellipsis, the omission of information that is subsequently understood without being overtly pronounced. Comprehension of ellipsis requires retrieval of an antecedent from memory, without prior prediction, a property which enables the study of retrieval in situ (Martin & McElree, 2008, 2009). Sluicing, or inflectional-phrase ellipsis, in the presence of a conjunction, presents a test case where a competing antecedent position is syntactically licensed, in contrast with most cases of nonadjacent dependency, including verb–phrase ellipsis. We present speed–accuracy tradeoff and eye-movement data inconsistent with the hypothesis that retrieval is accomplished via a syntactically guided search, a particular variant of search not examined in past research. The observed timecourse profiles are consistent with the hypothesis that antecedents are retrieved via a cue-dependent direct-access mechanism susceptible to general memory variables.