Deciding Upon Mode of Trial
Deciding Upon Mode of Trial
复制标题
决定审判方式
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Steven Cammiss
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Steven Cammiss
本文介绍了一个关于审判决策模式的实证研究项目的结果。虽然政策制定者一直关注被告在选择刑事法院审判中的作用，但对检察官和治安法官的作用关注较少。然而，有证据表明，他们是负责大多数可审判的案件，无论哪种方式到达刑事法院，解决当地法院的文化可能是一个更有效的方式来限制使用刑事法院。
This article presents the findings of an empirical research project into mode of trial decision making. While policy makers have consistently focused upon the role of defendants in electing Crown Court trial, less attention has been paid to the roles of prosecutors and magistrates. However, the evidence suggests that they are responsible for the majority of triable either way cases that reach the Crown Court, and tackling local court cultures may be a more effective way of limiting the use of the Crown Court.