Reply to “Comment on ‘Charge-Parity Symmetry Observed through Friedel Oscillations in Chiral Charge-Density Waves’”
Reply to “Comment on ‘Charge-Parity Symmetry Observed through Friedel Oscillations in Chiral Charge-Density Waves’”
复制标题
回复“评论‘通过手性电荷密度波中的弗里德尔振荡观察到的电荷宇称对称性’”
DOI:
10.1103/physrevb.86.247102
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
M. Oda and S. Tanda
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Ishioka;T. Fujii;K. Katono;K. Ichimura;T. Kurosawa;M. Oda and S. Tanda
We are responding to the Comment by J. Wezel on our paper. This study was developed from our previous work [Ishiokaet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 176401 (2010)10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.176401]. In the PRL paper,was defined as a new parameter for expressing CDW chirality for the first time. In his Comment, he claims thatis ill defined. He also claims that the initial phaseof the CDW wave function is a more appropriate parameter for expressing chiral CDW, despite our early introduction ofto explain the experimental data described in the PRL paper. However, we conclude thatcan distinguish the CDW chirality by its sign. Moreover, by considering differentsigns, we had succeeded in demonstrating the difference of the spatial distributions of CDWs as shown in Fig. 4 of the PRB paper [Phys. Rev. B 84, 245125 (2011)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.84.245125]. In our Reply, we discuss the validity of. We show that his argument regarding the identification of the CDW with the opposite sign of q is wrong, since the logic is inapplicable to a wave function with a nonzero. We also discuss the applicability ofto two- or three-dimensional CDWs in transition metal dichalcogenides.