The rise and fall of AIDS exceptionalism.
The rise and fall of AIDS exceptionalism.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.12.mhst1-0912
复制
发表时间:
2009-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bayer, Ronald
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oppenheimer, Gerald M;Bayer, Ronald
In the late 1980s, a group of social scientists convened in France to examine the question of how democratic societies in North America and Europe had confronted the challenges posed by AIDS [1]. As each collaborator recounted the history of the political, social, and public health responses evoked by HIV in his or her country, three questions remained constant, even though the precise language reflected unique cultural differences. Did the history of responses to lethal infectious diseases provide lessons about how best to contain the spread of HIV infection? Should the policies developed to control sexually transmitted diseases or other communicable conditions be applied to AIDS? If AIDS were not to be treated like other communicable diseases, what would justify using different policies?In some instances, these questions were explicitly addressed; on other occasions, they were simply implied in the critical policy discussions [2]. In summarizing the 2 days of discussion that ensued, one of us [RB] present at the meeting was struck by the “exceptional” nature of what had been decided in virtually every one of the cases considered. The term “HIV exceptionalism” thus emerged. It first appeared in print in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1991 [2]. Since then, the term has been used in numerous policy settings, domestic and global, as well as at many AIDS conferences. A MEDLINE search identifies more than 50 citations in the literature.