Rural households' livelihood responses to industry-based poverty alleviation as a sustainable route out of poverty
Rural households' livelihood responses to industry-based poverty alleviation as a sustainable route out of poverty
复制标题
农户产业扶贫的民生应对是可持续脱贫的途径
DOI：
10.1016/j.regsus.2020.07.002
复制
发表时间：
2020-09-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yu, Fangwei
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ding, Jianjun;Wang, Zhang;Yu, Fangwei
工业化是实现可持续脱贫的一种途径。在实施产业扶贫项目过程中，农村家庭对变化的生计响应至关重要。更强的生计响应有利于产业扶贫项目带来的多维脱贫，有效的扶贫也能激发更强的家庭响应。生计响应和多维脱贫效果之间存在一种良性循环，有助于实现可持续脱贫目标。本文从“人 - 产业 - 地”的协同视角出发，通过构建一个包含三个强度要素的四维生计响应衡量体系，阐释了连接生计响应、多维脱贫以及可持续脱贫路径的扶贫逻辑。我们分析了从4个连片贫困地区的4个样本县的2363户家庭收集的调查数据，衡量并比较了农村家庭生计响应的特征以及影响扶贫项目的因素。4个样本县的农村家庭生计响应处于中等水平。响应的四个维度按从高到低依次为生计策略响应、生计空间响应、生计产出响应和生计资本响应。三个强度表明，生计响应的认知和意愿要素非常相似，但这些要素与生计响应行动之间存在较大差距。在群体层面，贫困家庭比非贫困家庭有更高且更一致的生计响应。外部环境因素（如地理位置、产业类型、村庄组织能力和村风）和内部家庭因素（如资源禀赋、收入来源、健康、教育、劳动力数量、政策信任度、信贷可得性和社会网络）对家庭生计响应有显著影响。然而，这种影响在不同维度上有所不同，且强度各异。本文提出了一种多维脱贫机制，并给出了可持续脱贫路径的建议。
Industrialization is one way to achieve a sustainable route out of poverty. During the implementation of industry-based poverty alleviation projects, rural households' livelihood responses to change are crucial. A stronger livelihood response is conducive to multidimensional poverty relief due to industry-based poverty alleviation projects. Effective poverty alleviation can also stimulate stronger household responses. There is a positive cycle between livelihood response and multidimensional poverty relief effects that can help achieve sustainable poverty alleviation goals. Using a synergistic perspective on the relationship between "people-industry-land", this paper explains the poverty alleviation logic connecting livelihood response, multidimensional poverty relief, and sustainable routes out of poverty by constructing a four-dimensional livelihood response measurement system with three elements of intensity. We analyzed survey data collected from 2363 households from 4 sample counties in 4 contiguous poverty-stricken areas, and measured and compared the characteristics of rural households' livelihood responses and the factors influencing poverty alleviation projects. Rural households' livelihood responses in four sample counties were moderate. The four dimensions of responses were ranked as livelihood strategy response, livelihood space response, livelihood output response, and livelihood capital response. The three intensities indicated that the perception and willingness elements of livelihood response were very similar, but there was a big gap between those elements and livelihood response actions. At the group level, poor households had higher and more consistent livelihood response than non-poor households. External environment factors (such as location, industry type, village organizational ability, and village atmosphere) and internal family factors (such as resource endowment, income sources, health, education, labor quantity, policy trust, credit availability, and social networks) had a significant impact on households' livelihood response. However, this impact varied across different dimensions and had different intensities. This paper proposes a multidimensional poverty relief mechanism and suggests sustainable routes out of poverty.