The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission
The clash of practice: political controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding commission
复制标题
实践的冲突：政治争议与联合国建设和平委员会
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christian Bueger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christian Bueger
争议是政治的核心。实践理论提供了一种理解争议和潜在谈判的有效方法。在本文中，借鉴西奥多Schatzki，米歇尔·卡隆和布鲁诺·拉图尔的工作，我介绍了一个启发式理解争议。我认为，在争议中，经常处于危险之中的是如何处理政治问题的不同类型的做法。我将介绍其中的五种做法。我从全球政治的角度分析一个案例，以表明这种观点的价值-联合国建设和平委员会的争议被分析为处理建设和平的不同做法之间的冲突。
Controversy is at the heart of politics. Theories of practice offer a productive way of understanding controversies and potentially negotiating in them. In this paper, drawing on the work of Theodore Schatzki, Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, I introduce a heuristic for understanding controversies. I argue that what is often at stake in controversies are different types of practices of how a political issue should be handled. I introduce five of these types of practices. I analyse a case from global politics to demonstrate the value of such a perspective - the controversies in the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission are analysed as clashes between different practices of handling peacebuilding.