Authoritarian capitalism, authoritarian movements and authoritarian communication
Authoritarian capitalism, authoritarian movements and authoritarian communication
复制标题
威权资本主义、威权运动和威权传播
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Fuchs
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Fuchs
Paolo Gerbaudo的著作《面具和旗帜：民粹主义、公民主义和全球抗议》，其方法反映在他手头的《媒体、文化与社会》杂志的交叉流文章中，是对这些社会、政治和学术挑战的回应。我想问的是，CrossCurrents的这篇评论提出了以下问题：为什么近年来右翼威权民粹主义比左翼运动更受欢迎？右翼独裁运动如何沟通？为什么右翼的政治传播策略似乎获得并导致了大众的支持？法兰克福学派的权威主义批判理论以及相关学者对法西斯主义、纳粹主义和权威人格的批判，有助于我们批判地分析权威主义的传播。在这一背景下，特别是弗兰茨·诺依曼、埃里希·弗洛姆、西奥多·W.阿多诺、赫伯特·马尔库塞、利奥·勒文塔尔和威廉·赖希都是相关的。
Paolo Gerbaudo’s book The Mask and the Flag: Populism, Citizenism and Global Protest, whose approach is reflected in his Crosscurrents piece in the issue of Media, Culture & Society at hand, is a response to these societal, political and academic challenges. This CrossCurrents comment asks, I ask, the following: Why is it that right-wing authoritarian populism in recent times has become much more popular than left-wing movements? How do right-wing authoritarian movements communicate? Why is it that right-wing political communication strategies seem to garner and result in mass support? The critical theory of authoritarianism advanced by the Frankfurt School and related authors on fascism, Nazism, and the authoritarian personality help us to critically analyse the communication of authoritarianism. In this context, particularly the works by Franz Leopold Neumann, Erich Fromm, Theodor W. Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Leo Löwenthal, and Willhelm Reich are relevant.