Contesting the Settler City: Indigenous Self-Determination, New Urban Reserves, and the Neoliberalization of Colonialism
Contesting the Settler City: Indigenous Self-Determination, New Urban Reserves, and the Neoliberalization of Colonialism
复制标题
争夺定居者城市：原住民自决、新城市保留地和殖民主义的新自由主义化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Tomiak
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Tomiak
在定居者殖民的背景下，土著人民历来和正在遭受的剥夺和流离失所是理解城市空间生产的基础。现在被称为加拿大的城市是土著地方，是以土著人民正在被剥夺为前提的，这意味着什么？新的城市储备在颠覆或加强殖民资本主义社会空间秩序方面发挥了什么作用？本文结合加拿大新的城市保护区对这些问题进行了研究。在草原省份，最常见的新城市储备是位于城市以外的第一民族社区的卫星土地。虽然定居者国家将新的城市保留地狭隘地限制在新自由主义议程上，但原住民正在成功地推进保留地的创建，以实现经济自给自足，行使自决，并颠覆定居者国家的边界。我认为，新的城市保留地是相互矛盾的空间，是殖民者殖民国家权力和土著抵抗和地方创造的产物和工具。
In settler colonial contexts the historical and ongoing dispossession and displacement of Indigenous peoples is foundational to understanding the production of urban space. What does it mean that cities in what is now known as Canada are Indigenous places and premised on the ongoing dispossession of Indigenous peoples? What roles do new urban reserves play in subverting or reinforcing the colonial-capitalist sociospatial order? This paper examines these questions in relation to new urban reserves in Canada. Most common in the Prairie provinces, new urban reserves are satellite land holdings of First Nation communities located outside of the city. While the settler state narrowly confines new urban reserves to neoliberal agendas, First Nations are successfully advancing reserve creation to generate economic self-sufficiency, exercise self-determination, and subvert settler state boundaries. I argue that new urban reserves are contradictory spaces, as products and vehicles of settler-colonial state power and Indigenous resistance and place-making.
有限的认可：加拿大和澳大利亚的城市规划和原住民权利的文本调解
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Porter L
通讯作者：
Porter L