Relations between forms and functions of aggression and moral judgments of aggressive transgressions.
Relations between forms and functions of aggression and moral judgments of aggressive transgressions.
复制标题
侵略的形式和功能与侵略性越轨的道德判断之间的关系。
DOI：
10.1002/ab.21883
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Ostrov,JamieM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hart,EmilyJ;Ostrov,JamieM
本研究旨在探讨攻击性行为、精神病态和性别对攻击性越轨行为道德判断的影响。使用了攻击的二维概念化，例如主动关系攻击，反应性关系攻击，主动身体攻击和反应性身体攻击被视为攻击的不同亚型，也被视为攻击的道德判断的不同亚型。参与者为421名新兴成年人（215名女性）。收集了攻击性、精神病和道德判断的自我报告措施。从随机分配的73名参与者（46名女性）的子样本中获得了攻击性和精神病的同行报告，用于有效性目的。独特的协会被发现之间的亚型的侵略和相应的道德判断相同的亚型。
The present study sought to examine the influence of aggressive behavior, psychopathy, and gender on moral judgments of aggressive transgressions. A two‐dimensional conceptualization of aggression was used, such that proactive relational aggression, reactive relational aggression, proactive physical aggression, and reactive physical aggression were treated as distinct subtypes of aggression and also as distinct subtypes of moral judgments of aggression. Participants were 421 emerging adults (215 women). Self‐report measures of aggression, psychopathy, and moral judgments were collected. Peer‐reports of aggression and psychopathy were obtained from a randomly assigned subsample of 73 participants (46 women) for validity purposes. Unique associations were found between subtypes of aggression and corresponding moral judgments of the same subtypes.