BEAUTY IS TALENT - TASK EVALUATION AS A FUNCTION OF PERFORMERS PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS

BEAUTY IS TALENT - TASK EVALUATION AS A FUNCTION OF PERFORMERS PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/h0036018
复制
发表时间:
1974-01-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
SIGALL, H
SIGALL, H
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
LANDY, D;SIGALL, H

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

60名男性本科生阅读了一篇据称是由一名女大学新生写的文章。然后,他们从几个方面评估了这篇文章的质量和作者的能力。通过一张附在文章上的照片,20名学生被引导相信作者的外表很有吸引力,20名学生认为她没有吸引力。剩下的学生读了这篇文章,没有任何关于作者外表的信息。30名学生读一篇写得很好的文章,而另一名学生则读一篇写得不好的文章。预测并获得了对文章质量和作者吸引力的显著主效应。阅读好文章的学生比阅读差文章的学生对作者和作品的评价更好。SS还对这位作家和她的作品给予了最好的评价,当她很有吸引力时,至少在她不吸引人的时候,当她的外表不知名时,她的评价中等。当作者的作品“客观”质量相对较差时,作者的吸引力对她和她的作品的评价的影响最为明显。(参考文献15)(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA,版权所有)
60 male undergraduates read an essay supposedly written by a female college freshman. They then evaluated the quality of the essay and the ability of its writer on several dimensions. By means of a photo attached to the essay, 20 Ss were led to believe that the writer was physically attractive and 20 that she was unattractive. The remaining Ss read the essay without any information about the writer's appearance. 30 Ss read a version of the essay that was well written while the other Ss read a version that was poorly written. Significant main effects for essay quality and writer attractiveness were predicted and obtained. Ss who read the good essay evaluated the writer and her work more favorably that Ss who read the poor essay. Ss also evaluated the writer and her work most favorably when she was attractive, least when she was unattractive, and intermediately when her appearance was unknown. The impact of the writer's attractiveness on the evaluation of her and her work was most pronounced when the" objective" quality of her work was relatively poor.(15 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)