Träges Wissen: Die "unerklärliche" Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln
Träges Wissen: Die "unerklärliche" Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln
复制标题
Träges Wissen：Die “unerklärliche”Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alexander Renkl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alexander Renkl
Knowledge, although seemingly available, is often not used for solving problems, that means, it remains "inert". Three types of explanation for this phenomenon can be found in the literature. Meta-process explanations assume that the relevant knowledge is available, but it is not used because of inadequate meta-processes (e.g., lacking metacognitive control). Structure deficit explanations suppose that the deficit is rooted in the structure of the knowledge itself, that is, the knowledge is not available in a form that allows for ist application. In situatedness explanations, the traditional concepts of knowledge and transfer are questioned. One basic assumption is that knowledge is fundamentally situated, that is, context-bound. In recent years, instructional models have been developed which try to remedy the inert knowledge problem and which take into account many important aspects that have been raised by the different types of explanations referred to above. However, in order to reach a sufficient understanding of the inert knowledge phenomenon, the cooperation of different psychological sub- disciplines is called for.
