Comparing the performance of autocracies: issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance
Comparing the performance of autocracies: issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance
复制标题
比较独裁政权的表现：衡量独裁政权类型和表现的问题
DOI：
10.1080/13569775.2013.773201
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Edeltraud Roller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Edeltraud Roller
本文讨论了研究政治制度绩效的两个方法论问题。首先，它比较了Geddes等人开发的关于独裁政权类型的三个数据集的概念化和测量。(2012a)，哈德尼乌斯等人。(2012)，和Cheibub等人。(2010)。研究发现，这些数据集在对专制政权的概念化(狭义概念与灵活概念)和专制政权类型(分类标准、专制政权类型的数量和主要类型的定义)及其衡量水平(简单指标与复杂指标)方面存在差异。因此，数据集的选择对这类研究很重要。第二，关于绩效数据，本文总结了民主和专制政权数据可获得性问题的研究现状，讨论了可能对实证结果的影响，并提出了解决问题的方法。
This paper discusses two methodological issues in research studying the performance of political regimes. First, it compares the conceptualisation and measurement of three data sets on types of autocratic regimes developed by Geddes et al. (2012a), Hadenius et al. (2012), and Cheibub et al. (2010). The data sets are found to differ with respect to their conceptualisation of autocratic regimes (narrow vs. flexible concepts) and types of autocratic regimes (criteria for classification, number of autocratic regime types and definition of the main types), as well as their levels of measurement (simple vs. complex indicators). As a result, the choice of data sets matters for this type of research. Second, with respect to the data on performance, the paper summarises the current state of research on the issue of the availability of data for democratic and autocratic regimes, discusses possible effects on empirical findings and addresses ways to deal with the problem.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Badie, Bertrand;Berg-Schlosser, Dirk;Morlino, Leonardo
通讯作者：
Morlino, Leonardo