A strategy for validation of variables derived from large-scale electronic health record data.
A strategy for validation of variables derived from large-scale electronic health record data.
复制标题
大规模电子健康记录数据中变量的验证策略。
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103879
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Gupta, Samir
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Lin;Bustamante, Ranier;Earles, Ashley;Demb, Joshua;Messer, Karen;Gupta, Samir
关键词:
Standardized approaches for rigorous validation of phenotyping from large-scale electronic health record (EHR) data have not been widely reported. We proposed a methodologically rigorous and efficient approach to guide such validation, including strategies for sampling cases and controls, determining sample sizes, estimating algorithm performance, and terminating the validation process, hereafter referred to as the San Diego Approach to Variable Validation (SDAVV). We propose sample size formulae which should be used prior to chart review, based on pre-specified critical lower bounds for positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). We also propose a stepwise strategy for iterative algorithm development/validation cycles, updating sample sizes for data abstraction until both PPV and NPV achieve target performance. We applied the SDAVV to a Department of Veterans Affairs study in which we created two phenotyping algorithms, one for distinguishing normal colonoscopy cases from abnormal colonoscopy controls and one for identifying aspirin exposure. Estimated PPV and NPV both reached 0.970 with a 95% confidence lower bound of 0.915, estimated sensitivity was 0.963 and specificity was 0.975 for identifying normal colonoscopy cases. The phenotyping algorithm for identifying aspirin exposure reached a PPV of 0.990 (a 95% lower bound of 0.950), an NPV of 0.980 (a 95% lower bound of 0.930), and sensitivity and specificity were 0.960 and 1.000. A structured approach for prospectively developing and validating phenotyping algorithms from large-scale EHR data can be successfully implemented, and should be considered to improve the quality of “big data” research.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000896
发表时间:
2013-06-01
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Newton, Katherine M.;Peissig, Peggy L.;Denny, Joshua C.
通讯作者:
Denny, Joshua C.
DOI:
10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013315
发表时间:
2018-01-01
期刊:
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE, VOL 1
影响因子:
--
作者:
Banda, Juan M.;Seneviratne, Martin;Shah, Nigam H.
通讯作者:
Shah, Nigam H.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Jackson KL;Mbagwu M;Pacheco JA;Baldridge AS;Viox DJ;Linneman JG;Shukla SK;Peissig PL;Borthwick KM;Carrell DA;Bielinski SJ;Kirby JC;Denny JC;Mentch FD;Vazquez LM;Rasmussen-Torvik LJ;Kho AN
通讯作者:
Kho AN
影响因子:
3
作者:
Gruschow SM;Yerys BE;Power TJ;Durbin DR;Curry AE
通讯作者:
Curry AE
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Earles, Ashley;Liu, Lin;Gupta, Samir
通讯作者:
Gupta, Samir