Epidemiology of depressive disorders in the community.
Epidemiology of depressive disorders in the community.
复制标题
社区抑郁症的流行病学。
DOI:
10.1016/0165-0327(82)90029-5
复制
发表时间:
1982
影响因子:
6.6
通讯作者:
P. Bebbington
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Wing;P. Bebbington
The most recent commentators on the epidemiology of affective disorders have justly pointed out that there have been almost as many reviews as empirical studies (Boyd and Weissman 1982). This situation is not unfamiliar in the psychiatric literature; Mishler and Scotch (1963) made a similar comment about transcultural psychiatry 20 years ago. It reflects a confusion of conceptual approaches to common problems, a welter of conflicting empirical data resulting from this confusion, and numerous unsuccessful attempts to find a clearer perspective. In the case of the affective disorders, psychiatrists in hospital practice have long recognized, and tried to explain, a condition of severe depression or ‘melancholia’, but their formulations have rarely been straightforward. Griesinger, for example, who is chiefly remembered for his espousal of the concept of ‘unitary psychosis’ and of the statement ‘mental illness is cerebral illness’, was fully aware of the complexity of the interactions between host, agent and environment. He pointed out that melancholia can be distinguished from normal emotional reactions by reason of its severity, duration, independent development and the presence of other specific symptoms, and because there may be no psychosocial precipitants at all (Griesinger 1861). On the other hand, he recognized that individuals vary in the severity of their emotional reactions, some being highly sensitive to particular forms of adversity, whether arising from a sudden catastrophe or from what Jaspers (1963) called ‘one of the fixities of fate’, such as ‘the wasting of hope with increasing age’. Kraepelin (1913, 1921) simplified matters considerably by postulating an inherited disease entity called ‘Manic-Depressive Psychosis’ but only at the expense of enduring controversy about the supposed homogeneity of what had been included (eg Leonhard 1971, 1979) and the supposed independence of what had been left out (eg Lewis 1934). All the problems arising in current research into the affective disorders-normal versus abnormal, trait versus state, categorical versus dimensional, primary versus secondary, unipolar versus bipolar, endogenous versus exogenous or neurotic or reactive-have been given long and concentrated attention by capable psychiatrists, but have remained substantially unresolved. Indeed, they have been posed in even more difficult form in the light of recent studies of samples of the
影响因子:
--
作者:
Boyd,JH;Weissman,MM
通讯作者:
Weissman,MM