Rhetoric and Public Reasoning
Rhetoric and Public Reasoning
复制标题
修辞与公共推理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Yack
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Yack
这篇文章问为什么亚里士多德，当然没有朋友无限的民主，似乎更舒适与不受约束的修辞在政治审议比目前的捍卫者审议民主。它通过重建和捍卫对政治审议的明显的亚里士多德式理解来回答这个问题，这种理解可以从《修辞学》、《政治学》和《尼各马可伦理学》中的一系列单独的论点中拼凑出来。
This essay asks why Aristotle, certainly no friend to unlimited democracy, seems so much more comfortable with unconstrained rhetoric in political deliberation than current defenders of deliberative democracy. It answers this question by reconstructing and defending a distinctly Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation, one that can be pieced together out of a series of separate arguments made in the Rhetoric, the Politics, and the Nicomachean Ethics.