A research team in ethnography
A research team in ethnography
复制标题
民族志研究团队
DOI：
10.1080/095183900235744
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Geoff Troman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Woods;Mari Boyle;Bob Jeffrey;Geoff Troman
有迹象表明，团队在人种学研究中越来越受欢迎。在英国，新技术和研究评估工作促进了团队的建立和延续。在本文中，作者讨论了他们近年来在一个特定的研究小组的经验。获得足够的资金是必不可少的结构性先决条件。作者根据功能和分析级别区分了项目团队、联合团队和整个团队。他们考虑团队结构、方法、业务和过程，以及个人和团队之间的关系。团队合作使得更广泛、更深入的工作覆盖、更广泛的比较基础和多个研究人员的三角测量成为可能。该小组提供了一个讨论道德问题的论坛，一个即时的支持性参考小组。它开拓了视野，促进了个人的变化和发展。它有助于分析和写作，促进了更清晰、更有力的论点。文章最后提出了一些警告。
There are signs that teams are becoming more popular in ethnographic research. New technology and, in the UK, the Research Assessment Exercise have facilitated the establishment and continuance of teams. In this paper, the authors discuss their experiences in one particular research team in recent years. Securing adequate funding has been the essential structural prerequisite. The authors distinguish among project, federated, and whole teams, depending on function and level of analysis. They consider team structure, approach, business, and processes, and the relationship between individual and team. Teamwork has enabled a wider and deeper coverage of work, a broader comparative base, and multiple researcher triangulation. The team provides a forum for the discussion of ethical issues, an immediate supportive reference group. It has opened up horizons, and promoted individual change and development. It has aided analysis and writing, and promoted clearer and more robust arguments. The article concludes with some caveats.