Issue Framing in Conversations for Change: Discursive Interaction Strategies for "Doing Differences"

Issue Framing in Conversations for Change: Discursive Interaction Strategies for "Doing Differences"
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0021886312438858
复制
发表时间:
2012-06-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Bouwen, Rene
Bouwen, Rene
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dewulf, Art;Bouwen, Rene

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在多个参与者就复杂问题进行变革对话时,问题框架的差异必然会出现。当参与者用不同的术语来表达一个问题的含义时,他们面临着在进一步的对话中处理这种框架差异的挑战。作者借鉴了框架,二元性和互动的文献,探讨对话中的参与者如何通过语言互动来处理这些框架差异。以话语和会话分析为方法论,作者分析了自然资源管理多参与者项目背景下的互动序列。五个互动策略,涉及不同的方式“做差异”的框架纳入,框架断开,框架极化,框架调节,框架重新连接。这些互动策略中的每一个的话语特征可以通过考虑参与者在进行变革对话时所面临的多种互动挑战来理解。
In conversations for change between multiple actors about complex issues, differences in issue framing are bound to emerge. When the participants frame the meaning of an issue in diverging terms, they face the challenge of dealing with this frame difference in the further conversation. The authors draw on literature on framing, dualities, and interaction to explore how participants in conversations deal with these frame differences through language-in-interaction. With discourse and conversation analysis as a methodological approach, the authors analyzed interaction sequences in the context of multi-actor projects of natural resources management. Five interaction strategies that involve different ways of "doing differences" are identified-frame incorporation, frame disconnection, frame polarization, frame accommodation, and frame reconnection. The discursive characteristics of each of these interaction strategies can be understood by considering the multiple interactional challenges faced by participants when they engage in conversations for change.