Democratic Experimentalism or Capitalist Synchronization? Critical Reflections on Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy
Democratic Experimentalism or Capitalist Synchronization? Critical Reflections on Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy
复制标题
民主实验主义还是资本主义同步化？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
W. Scheuerman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Scheuerman
当代的“灵活资本主义”需要新形式的法律监管。在这种背景下，乔舒亚·科恩、迈克尔·多夫、冯国经和查尔斯·萨贝尔为一种新的监管法律模式提出了一系列具有挑衅性的建议，他们将其描述为“民主实验主义”或“直接商议的多政体”。他们的提议受到了批评：他们不仅没有足够认真地对待传统的自由民主法治美德，而且还不清楚他们是否能有效地驯服资本主义并使之人性化。相反，一些证据表明，他们的提议完全等同于法律体系与当代高速资本主义之间存在常态问题的同步。
Contemporary “flexible capitalism” requires novel forms of legal regulation. In this vein, Joshua Cohen, Michael Dorf, Archon Fung, and Charles Sabel have developed a provocative set of proposals for a new mode of regulatory law, what they describe as “democratic experimentalism” or, alternately, “directly deliberative polyarchy.” Their proposal are criticized: they not only fail to take traditional liberal democratic rule of law virtues seriously enough, but it remains unclear whether they can effectively tame and humanize capitalism. Instead, some evidence suggests that their proposals simply amount to a normatively problematic synchronization of the legal system with contemporary high-speed capitalism.