Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence
Phylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00133.x
复制
发表时间：
2004-11-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Quicke, DLJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Belokobylskij, SA;Zaldivar-Riverón, A;Quicke, DLJ
采用最大简约分析法研究了茧蜂亚科Doryctinae的143个属之间的进化关系，其中包括100个外部形态特征和4个研究较少的特征系统（雄性生殖器、产卵器结构、毒液器和幼虫头部结构）。我们调查的“性能”的字符从外部形态和其他字符系统和丰富的缺失条目的影响，通过比较数据的决定性，保留和一致性指数的四个不同的字符分区。结果表明，不同分区的表现与缺失条目的比例无关，而与其信息特征的比例呈负相关，表明该组中的形态信息具有高度的同质性。外部形态分区相对于包括基于ILD测试的其他字符系统的数据集是显著不一致的。分析既不支持大部落Doryctini和Hecabolini的单系，也不支持Spathiini和Heterospilini的单系。从逐次逼近加权分析获得的完整数据的关系有很大的不同，从目前接受的部落和亚部落分类。唯一的例外是Ypsistocerini和Ecphylini，其公认的成员被发现在单一的分支。Binaerini和Holcobraconini之间的密切关系，也Monarea，是一贯支持的毒液器官和产卵器结构特征，但不表示外部形态数据。在所有分析中，大多数回收的分支获得的低引导值不允许我们提出一个有意义的重新分类组在这个时候。一个完整的名单，公认的属和他们的同义词。(C)2004伦敦林奈学会，林奈学会动物学杂志，2004，142，369-404。
The evolutionary relationships among most (143 genera) of the currently recognized genera of the braconid wasp subfamily Doryctinae were investigated using maximum parsimony analysis, employing 100 characters from external morphology and four additional, less well-studied character systems (male genitalia, ovipositor structure, venom apparatus and larval cephalic structure). We investigated the `performance' of characters from external morphology and the other character systems and the effects of abundant missing entries by comparing the data decisiveness, retention and consistency indices of four different character partitions. The results indicate that the performances of the different partitions are not related to the proportions of missing entries, but instead are negatively correlated to their proportion of informative characters, suggesting that the morphological information in this group is subject to high levels of homoplasy. The external morphological partition is significantly incongruent with respect to a data set comprising the other character systems based on the ILD test. Analyses supported neither the monophyly of the large tribes Doryctini and Hecabolini, nor the monophyly of the Spathiini and Heterospilini. Relationships obtained from successive approximation weighting analysis for the complete data differ considerably from the currently accepted tribal and subtribal classifications. The only exceptions were the Ypsistocerini and the Ecphylini, whose recognized members were recovered in single clades. A close relationship between the Binaerini and Holcobraconini, and also Monarea, is consistently supported by venom apparatus and ovipositor structure characters but is not indicated by external morphological data. Low bootstrap values obtained for most of the recovered clades in all analyses do not allow us to propose a meaningful reclassification for the group at this time. A complete list of the recognized genera and their synonymies is given. (C) 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 142, 369-404.