Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Job Content Questionnaire in Taiwanese workers
Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Job Content Questionnaire in Taiwanese workers
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15327558ijbm1001_02
复制
发表时间：
2003-01-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Guo, YL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cheng, YW;Luh, WN;Guo, YL
本研究以551名男性和648名女性为被试，对工作内容问卷（C-JCL）中的工作控制、心理需求、上司支持和同事支持四个维度的信度和效度进行了研究。工作控制、主管支持和同事支持的Cronbach α系数都在0.80以上。而心理需求为0.55，表明该分量表的内部一致性不足。参与者在3个月的时间内相对一致地回答了问卷项目。探索性因素分析揭示了4个经验因素，这与JCL的理论结构密切相关。正如该模型所预测的那样，工作满意度最低的是“等应变”类别的工人（即，高要求与低控制和低社会支持相结合）。这些研究结果表明，C-JCL是可靠和有效的评估台湾工人的心理社会工作条件，但需要进一步改进的心理需求分量表。
The reliability and validity of four selected scales-namely, job control, psychological demands, supervisor support, and coworker support-from the Chinese Version of the Job Content Questionnaire (C-JCL) were studied in 551 male and 648 female workers in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for job control, supervisor support, and coworker support were all above .80. Whereas it was .55 for psychological demands, indicating insufficient internal consistency for this subscale. Participants responded to questionnaire items relatively consistently over a 3-month period. Exploratory factor analyses disclosed 4 empirical factors, which corresponded closely with theoretical constructs of the JCL. As predicted by the model, lowest levels of job satisfaction were found in workers in "iso-strain" category (i.e., high demands combined with low control and low social support). These findings indicated that the C-JCL is reliable and valid for assessing psychosocial work conditions among Taiwanese workers, although further improvement is needed for the psychological demands subscale.