Comment on “A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability” by Møller and Thornhill
Comment on “A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability” by Møller and Thornhill
复制标题
对 Møller 和 Thornhill 的“发育稳定性遗传力的荟萃分析”的评论
DOI：
10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10010017.x
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
D. Houle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Houle
我发现这是一篇非常激动人心的论文。我赞同梅勒和桑希尔的信念，即FA的继承是一个理想的荟萃分析主题。我觉得非常令人惊讶的是，波动不对称(FA)的加性遗传方差可以像Mailer和ThornHill(以下简称M&T)发现的那样高。这让我质疑FA是否像几乎所有写过这一主题的人所假设的那样，在对称性上主导了表型差异。此外，我认为M&T对遗传变异模式的解释并不令人信服。波动不对称性的建模通常是假设成对的每个成员独立于相同的正态分布(即Palmer和Strobeck，1986)，方差为a2/2。在这种情况下，成对结构之间的预期差异是以均值0和方差g2为正态分布的。该模型的一个非常重要的特征是FA值的方差太大，以至于任何特定个体的FA值都不能很好地预测群体的平均FA值。总人口FA期望值为
I found this a very stimulating paper. I share Mailer and Thornhill’s conviction that the inheritance of FA is an ideal topic for a meta-analysis. I find it quite surprising that the additive genetic variance of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) can be as high as Mailer and Thornhill (hereafter M&T) have found. This has led me to question whether FA dominates the phenotypic variance in symmetry, as virtually everyone who has written on this topic assumes. In addition, I find the explanations put forward by M&T for the patterns of genetic variance unconvincing. Fluctuating asymmetry is usually modelled by assuming that each member of a pair is drawn independently from identical normal distributions (i.e., Palmer and Strobeck, 1986), with variance a2/2. In this case, the expected difference between the paired structures is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance g2. A very important feature of this model is that the variance of FA values is so large that the FA value of any particular individual will be a poor predictor of the mean FA value of the population. The expected value of FA over the population is
1930年代和1940年代日本教育机构的转型重组过程(3) - 从战时到战后初期的变化 -
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
教育史学会会報
影响因子：
--
作者：
Mori;S.;矢野智司;梶山雅史
通讯作者：
梶山雅史