NGO-academia research co-production in humanitarian settings: opportunities and challenges.

NGO-academia research co-production in humanitarian settings: opportunities and challenges.
复制标题

非政府组织与学术界在人道主义环境下的研究合作:机遇与挑战。

DOI:
10.1111/disa.12556
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Lokot M
Lokot M
中科院分区:
管理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lokot M

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

“共同生产”一词越来越多地用于描述各种形式的研究伙伴关系,从卫生部门的应用扩展到其他领域。在人道主义背景下,随着对本地化和非殖民化援助的更多呼吁,研究合作生产正在成为解决非政府组织(非政府组织)-学术界研究伙伴关系中权力动态的一种手段。基于半结构化的采访从业者和学者的共同生产的研究和参与研究伙伴关系的经验,本文提出了与共同生产的研究在人道主义环境中的机遇和挑战。调查结果表明,与人道主义领域的其他流行语类似,“共同生产”的标签有时不加批判地适用于任何类型的研究伙伴关系。该研究强调了在人道主义背景下将权力集中在共同制作的研究中的重要性,并建议虽然共同制作一词有时被滥用,但这一概念背后的原则对于解开人道主义部门内的权力等级仍然至关重要。
The term ‘co‐production’ is increasingly used to describe varied forms of research partnerships, expanding from its application within the health sector to other areas. In humanitarian settings, alongside more calls for localisation and decolonising aid, research co‐production is emerging as a means of tackling power dynamics within NGO (non‐governmental organisation)–academia research partnerships. Based on semi‐structured interviews with practitioners and academics with experience of co‐producing research and participating in research partnerships, this paper presents the opportunities and challenges associated with co‐producing research in humanitarian settings. The findings suggest that similar to other buzzwords in the humanitarian sector, the label of ‘co‐production’ is sometimes uncritically applied to any kind of research partnership. The study emphasises the importance of centring power within co‐produced research in humanitarian settings and suggests that while the term co‐production is sometimes misappropriated, the principles underlying this concept remain essential to unravelling power hierarchies within the humanitarian sector.