Housing Satisfaction in Finland with Regard to Area, Dwelling Type and Tenure Status.
Housing Satisfaction in Finland with Regard to Area, Dwelling Type and Tenure Status.
复制标题
DOI：
10.21101/cejph.a4080
复制
发表时间：
2015-12
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Maria Pekkonen;U. Haverinen-Shaughnessy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maria Pekkonen;U. Haverinen-Shaughnessy
目的 本研究对芬兰的住房满意度及其与不同类型的居住区、住宅和保有权状况的关系进行了全面审查，同时考虑了社会人口和社会经济变量。方法 使用芬兰家庭随机样本的问卷数据（答复率为 44%，N=1,308），通过多元逻辑回归分析住房满意度与居住区类型、住宅和保有权状态之间的关联。结果 来自农村地区和居住在独立屋的受访者对夏季室内热条件的满意度分别显着高于居住在市中心（OR 2.01）和公寓（OR 1.75）的受访者（p<0.05）。房主对住宅（OR 3.19）、室内空气质量（OR 1.73）和冬季热条件（OR 2.63）更加满意，并且报告潮湿或霉菌损坏（OR 0.37）和邻居噪音干扰（OR 0.60）的频率低于租户。结论 根据这项研究，决定住房满意度差异的最重要因素是保有权状况和住房类型。在住房政策制定的背景下，这些结果值得特别考虑出租公寓的住房质量。结果还可用于对多户建筑和住宅区进行比较评估（例如检测相对优势或需要改进的区域）。
AIM This study presents a comprehensive examination of housing satisfaction in Finland and how it associates with different types of residential area, dwelling and tenure status taking into account socio-demographic and socioeconomic variables. METHODS Associations between housing satisfaction and types of residential area, dwelling and tenure status were analysed by multivariate logistic regression using questionnaire data from a random sample of Finnish households (response rate 44%, N=1,308). RESULTS Respondents from rural areas and those living in houses were statistically significantly (p<0.05) more satisfied with indoor thermal conditions in summer than respondents living in city centres (OR 2.01) and apartments (OR 1.75), respectively. Homeowners were more satisfied with the dwelling (OR 3.19), indoor air quality (OR 1.73) and thermal conditions in winter (OR 2.63), and reported moisture or mould damage (OR 0.37) and neighbour noise disturbance (OR 0.60) less frequently than tenants. CONCLUSION Based on this study, the most important factors determining differences in housing satisfaction were tenure status and type of the dwelling. In the context of housing policy development, these results warrant a special consideration of housing quality in rental apartments. The results can also be used for making comparative assessments (e.g. detecting areas of relative strengths or needing improvement) of multifamily buildings and residential areas.