In the Face of Critique: A Metasynthesis of the Experiences of Journalists Covering Health and Science

In the Face of Critique: A Metasynthesis of the Experiences of Journalists Covering Health and Science
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1075547011409952
复制
发表时间:
2012-04-01
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
Secko, David M.
Secko, David M.
中科院分区:
人文科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Amend, Elyse;Secko, David M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

与健康和科学新闻有关的定性文献经常指出,人们对记者的观点知之甚少。这在一定程度上是因为个别研究就像散落的拼图拼图。在这篇文章中,作者报告了旨在重新组合涉及健康和科学记者的定性文献的定性综合集成的结果。全面的文献搜索给出了21项研究的数据集,这些研究的综合产生了14个元主题和4个分类分类。这一综合被用来展示定性知识的状态和未来研究的潜力。
The qualitative literature related to health and science journalism often states that little is known about the perspectives of journalists. This is, in part, because of individual studies being like scattered pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. In this article, the authors report the results of a qualitative meta-synthesis aimed at reassembling the qualitative literature involving health and science journalists. Comprehensive literature searches gave a data set of 21 studies whose synthesis produced 14 metathemes and four taxonomic groupings. This synthesis is used to show the state of qualitative knowledge and the potential for future research.