Tactical evaluations: Everyday neoliberalism in academia
Tactical evaluations: Everyday neoliberalism in academia
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1440783318759094
复制
发表时间：
2018-03-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Cannizzo, Fabian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cannizzo, Fabian
新自由主义政治理性不仅改变了国家政策议程，也改变了个人日常生活所采取的策略。有时被描述为日常新自由主义”。本文通过澳大利亚学者的案例研究，探讨了日常新自由主义对工作场所道德转型的贡献。国家高等教育政策改革反映在学术界对于何种形式的自我管理是合法和必要的看法的转变。 While governmental reforms are couched in a language of technical efficiency and accountability to stakeholders, interviews with academics reveal depoliticising practices of evaluation.学术自主权和管理效率之间的价值观冲突表明了学者在评估自己和工作的方式上的战术斗争。大学治理的管理化并没有削弱政治和价值承诺，而是鼓励学者追求更加个性化的道德形式，这再次确认了他们遵守管理规范。
Neoliberal political rationalities have transformed not only national policy agendas, but also the strategies that individuals adopt to navigate their everyday lives; sometimes described as everyday neoliberalism'. This article explores everyday neoliberalism's contribution to the transformation of workplace ethics through a case study of Australian academics. National higher education policy reforms have been mirrored by a transformation in academics' perceptions of what forms of self-management are legitimate and necessary. While governmental reforms are couched in a language of technical efficiency and accountability to stakeholders, interviews with academics reveal depoliticising practices of evaluation. Values conflicts - between scholarly autonomy and managerial efficiency - are indicative of tactical struggles over the means by which academics evaluate their selves and their labour. The managerialisation of university governance has not eroded political and value commitments, but has encouraged academics to pursue more individualised forms of ethics, which re-affirm their compliance with managerial norms.