A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.
A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.
复制标题
对威权主义与陪审员对被告有罪看法之间关联的荟萃分析。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Moran
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Douglas J. Narby;B. Cutler;G. Moran
尽管有学术批评，陪审员的态度或个体差异可能会影响刑事审判中的判决选择。权威主义是一个面子有效的预测器。对20项探索权威主义与裁决关系的研究进行了元分析，以检验这一假设。权威主义措施（传统的或法律的），主题类型，演示媒体的审判，和犯罪类型的影响。研究结果支持权威主义-裁决关系和权威主义类型的调节效应。法律的权威主义与判决的相关性更强。主题类型，演示介质和犯罪类型也是重要的主持人。对未来的研究，以及法律的和司法实践的影响，进行了讨论
Despite scholarly criticism, juror attitudes or individual differences might affect verdict choice in criminal trials. Authoritarianism is a face valid predictor. Twenty studies exploring the authoritarianism-verdict relation were meta-analyzed to test this hypothesis. Authoritarianism measure (traditional or legal), subject type, presentation medium of trial, and type of crime were examined as moderators of the effect. Results support an authoritarianism-verdict relation and the moderator effect of authoritarianism type. Legal authoritarianism correlated more strongly with verdict. Subject type, presentation medium, and type of crime were also significant moderators. Implications for future research, as well as for legal and judicial practice, are discussed