Fatigue from high- and low-frequency muscle stimulation: contractile and biochemical alterations.

Fatigue from high- and low-frequency muscle stimulation: contractile and biochemical alterations.
复制标题

高频和低频肌肉刺激引起的疲劳:收缩和生化改变。

DOI:
10.1152/jappl.1987.62.5.2075
复制
发表时间:
1987
期刊:
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fitts,RH
Fitts,RH
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Metzger,JM;Fitts,RH

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究探讨了高(75 Hz,1分钟)和低(5 Hz,1.5分钟)频率刺激对膈肌收缩和生化特性的影响。在高频和低频刺激后,张力分别降低至初始值的21 +/- 1和54 +/- 2%(SE)。在从高频刺激恢复0、0.25、1和2分钟后,5 Hz引起比75 Hz刺激更多的力(表示为初始张力的%)。对于75 Hz和5 Hz刺激,时间0恢复值分别为初始力的21 +/- 1和78 +/- 6%。1分钟的恢复,5 Hz刺激引起的力已恢复到疲劳前的值。相反,75 Hz刺激产生的力直到10-15分钟才完全恢复。低频刺激产生疲劳后,5 Hz刺激产生的力减少到初始张力的54 +/- 2%,该值显著低于75 Hz刺激引起的初始力的71 +/- 2%。在恢复的前15秒内,5 Hz刺激产生的力迅速增加(0秒时为54 +/- 2%,15秒时为70 +/- 2%),到5分钟时,5 Hz刺激产生的力显著大于75 Hz刺激产生的力(100 +/- 3 vs. 93 +/- 1%)。如前所述,在75 Hz的刺激力的生产没有完全恢复,直到10-15分钟。这两个疲劳协议产生了显着的等长收缩和一半的放松时间延长。磷酸肌酸(CP)浓度降低,肌肉乳酸增加,这两个疲劳协议。(250字处删节)
This study examined the effect of high- (75 Hz, 1 min) and low- (5 Hz, 1.5 min) frequency stimulation on contractile and biochemical properties of the diaphragm. Tension was reduced to 21 +/- 1 and 54 +/- 2% (SE) of the initial value after high- and low-frequency stimulation, respectively. After 0, 0.25, 1, and 2 min of recovery from high-frequency stimulation, 5 Hz elicited more force (expressed as % of initial tension) than 75-Hz stimulation. Time 0 recovery values were 21 +/- 1 and 78 +/- 6% of the initial force for 75- and 5-Hz stimulation, respectively. By 1 min of recovery, force elicited by 5-Hz stimulation had returned to the prefatigue value. In contrast, force production with 75-Hz stimulation did not full recover until 10–15 min. After fatigue produced by low-frequency stimulation, force production with 5-Hz stimulation was reduced to 54 +/- 2% of the initial tension, a value significantly lower than the 71 +/- 2% of initial force elicited by 75-Hz stimulation. Force production with 5-Hz stimulation increased rapidly in the first 15 s of recovery (54 +/- 2% at 0 and 70 +/- 2% at 15 s) and by 5 min was significantly greater than the force elicited by 75-Hz stimulation (100 +/- 3 vs. 93 +/- 1%). As before, force production at 75-Hz stimulation did not fully recover until 10–15 min. Both fatigue protocols produced a significant prolongation in isometric twitch contraction and one-half relaxation times. Creatine phosphate (CP) concentration was reduced and muscle lactate increased by both fatigue protocols.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)