Driver Behavior Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Simulation for Advanced Driving Maneuvers
Driver Behavior Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Simulation for Advanced Driving Maneuvers
复制标题
高级驾驶操作的静态和动态模拟的驾驶员行为比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Mulder
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Grácio;M. Wentink;A. Pais;R. V. Paassen;M. Mulder
在高级驾驶操纵中，例如障碍赛操纵，假设驾驶员使用所有可用的提示来优化他们的驾驶性能。例如，在曲线驾驶中，驾驶员使用横向加速度来调整汽车速度。在驾驶模拟中也可以发现同样的结果。然而，对于可比较的曲线，驾驶员在固定底座模拟器中驾驶的速度比实际驾驶汽车时更快。驾驶行为的这种差异随着模拟器中惯性运动反馈的使用而减小。文献表明，驾驶行为中惯性线索的有益效果随着操纵难度的增加而增加。因此，对于诸如快速回转的极端机动，当将固定基座条件与具有惯性运动的条件进行比较时，驾驶行为的改变是预期的。据推测，在模拟器中的驾驶行为的变化时，运动线索存在于极端的演习。为了验证这一假设，通过测量快速回转中的驾驶行为，对No-Motion和Motion汽车驾驶模拟进行了比较。采用受试者内设计，20名受试者在两种条件下驾驶快速回转。运动条件下的平均速度显著低于无运动条件下的平均速度。对于汽车模型产生的峰值横向加速度也发现了同样的情况。对方向盘转角信号进行的功率谱密度分析表明，两种实验条件下的控制输入行为不同。此外，配对比较的结果表明，受试者更喜欢驾驶与运动反馈。从较低的驾驶速度和方向盘上不同的控制输入，我们得出结论，运动反馈导致驾驶行为的显着变化。
In advanced driving maneuvers, such as a slalom maneuver, it is assumed that drivers use all the available cues to optimize their driving performance. For example, in curve driving, drivers use lateral acceleration to adjust car velocity. The same result can be found in driving simulation. However, for comparable curves, drivers drove faster in fixed-base simulators than when actually driving a car. This difference in driving behavior decreases with the use of inertial motion feedback in simulators. The literature suggests that the beneficial effect of inertial cues in driving behavior increases with the difficulty of the maneuver. Therefore, for an extreme maneuver such as a fast slalom, a change in driving behavior is expected when a fixed-base condition is compared to a condition with inertial motion. It is hypothesized that driving behavior in a simulator changes when motion cues are present in extreme maneuvers. To test the hypothesis, a comparison between No-Motion and Motion car driving simulation was done, by measuring driving behavior in a fast slalom. A within-subjects design was used, with 20 subjects driving the fast slalom in both conditions. The average speed during the Motion condition was significantly lower than the average speed during the No-Motion condition. The same was found for the peak lateral acceleration generated by the car model. A power spectral density analysis performed on the steering wheel angle signal showed different control input behavior between the two experimental conditions. In addition, the results from a paired comparison showed that subjects preferred driving with motion feedback. From the lower driving speed and different control input on the steering wheel, we concluded that motion feedback led to a significant change in driving behavior.