[Knowledge used in duration judgments of two moving objects].
[Knowledge used in duration judgments of two moving objects].
复制标题
[用于判断两个运动物体的持续时间的知识]。
DOI：
10.4992/jjpsy.71.128
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Matsuda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Tanimura;F. Matsuda
49名大学生在CRT显示器上观察两辆汽车朝同一方向行驶不同的时间。然后，他们选择了他们认为跑得更久的车，并给出了他们选择的原因。有三种类型的任务。正确的判断是可能的第一种类型，通过逻辑上应用任何两个知识的持续时间：“持续时间等于时间的终点减去时间的起点”（知识阿尔法）或“持续时间等于距离除以速度”（知识贝塔）。只有阿尔法知识对第二种类型有用，而只有贝塔知识才能对第三种类型做出正确的判断。主要研究结果如下：（1）无论何种类型，大学生都更倾向于使用知识alpha而不是beta。(2)反复做出判断、思考判断的原因或接受失败的反馈都没有很大帮助，使参与者意识到使用第三种类型的知识测试版的必要性。(3)只有大约20%的本科生能够使用每种类型所需的适当知识。
Forty-nine undergraduates observed two cars traveling in the same direction on a CRT display for various duration. They then chose the car that they believed had run longer, and gave the reason for their choice. There were three types of tasks. Correct judgment was possible for the first type, by logically applying either of two pieces of knowledge about duration: "duration equals temporal end point minus temporal start point" (Knowledge alpha) or "duration equals distance divided by speed" (Knowledge beta). Knowledge alpha alone was useful for the second type, while only Knowledge beta led to correct judgment for the third. Main results were as follows: (1) Undergraduates were more likely to use Knowledge alpha than beta regardless of the types. (2) None of repeatedly making judgment, thinking about reasons for judgment, or receiving failure feedback was very helpful making participants become aware of necessity of using Knowledge beta for the third type. (3) Only some 20% of undergraduates were able to use proper knowledge specifically required for each type.