SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF «RURAL TERRITORIES» AND ITS PLACE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF «RURAL TERRITORIES» AND ITS PLACE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
复制标题
“农村领土”概念的科学和理论内容及其在公共管理中的地位
DOI：
10.36887/2415-8453-2021-3-34
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Potryvaieva
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oleksii Garkusha;O. Dovgal;N. Potryvaieva
本文考察了不同研究者对农村概念的解读。研究发现，作为“农村”这一类别内容基础的最常用特征是农业生产部门的空间位置及其附带的行政领土地位。建议将“农村地区”定义为人口密度低于每1平方公里300人的住区。总结国内研究人员的方法，并考虑到我们对形成、利用和再生产的某些方面的看法，农村地区的资源潜力是农村社区、国家领土及其独立地区拥有和/或使用的实际和潜在的自然、人口、旅游、娱乐和工业资源。分析了农村在国家和地区社会经济发展体系中的作用和地位。因此，决定农村发展的主要形式和方向的最重要的社会机构是国家，以中央和地方当局为代表。国家研究院以相关法规的形式制定游戏的一般规则，充当仲裁者，对农业经济的生产和基础设施部分提供财政支持。国民经济农业部门、土地改革和权力下放改革的质变进程，合乎逻辑地达到了乌克兰农民制度化的阶段，乌克兰农民失去了在农业生产和国家领土上的歧视性作用。后者具有资源潜力，在适当条件下可在农业和非农业生产领域同样有效地加以利用。同时，需要转向可持续发展的原则，使我们能够把农村地区的自然资源视为一种价值。
The article examines the interpretation of the concept of rural areas by different researchers. It was found that the most frequently used characteristics, which are taken as the basis of the content of the category "rural areas" are the spatial location of the agricultural sector of production and the attached administrative-territorial status. It is proposed to define "rural areas" as settlements with a population density of less than 300 people per 1 km2. Summarizing the approaches of domestic researchers and considering our vision of certain aspects of formation, use and reproduction, the resource potential of rural areas is the actual and potential set of natural, demographic, tourist, recreational and industrial resources owned and / or used by rural communities, territories of the country and its separate regions. The role and place of rural areas in the system of socio-economic development of the state and regions are analyzed. Thus, the most important social institutions that determine the dominant forms and directions of rural development are the state, represented by central and local authorities. The institute of the state formulates the general rules of the game in the form of relevant regulations, acts as an arbitrator and provides financial support for the production and infrastructure components of the agricultural economy. The process of qualitative changes in the agricultural sector of the national economy, in land reform and decentralization reform, has logically reached the stage of institutionalization of the Ukrainian peasantry, which loses its discriminatory role in agricultural production and country territories. The latter have the resource potential, which under appropriate conditions can be used equally effectively in both agricultural and non-agricultural spheres of production. At the same time, the need to move to the principles of sustainable development, allows to consider the natural resources of rural areas as a value.
Key words: rural areas, socio-economic development, state, region.