POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT

POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT
复制标题

DOI:
10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.01
复制
发表时间:
2013-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.3
通讯作者:
Hevner, Alan R.
Hevner, Alan R.
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gregor, Shirley;Hevner, Alan R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

设计科学研究(DSR)已经成为一种重要而合法的信息系统(IS)研究范式。我们认为,DSR尚未达到其充分的潜在影响的发展和使用的信息系统,由于差距的理解和应用DSR的概念和方法。本文旨在帮助研究人员(1)理解可能是DSR贡献的工件抽象的水平,(2)在准备期刊文章或其他学术著作时确定消费和生产知识的适当方式,(3)理解和定位他们的研究项目的知识贡献,以及(4)构建DSR文章,以便它强调对知识库的重大贡献。我们的重点贡献是DSR知识贡献框架与两个维度的基础上,在现有的知识状态的问题和解决方案领域的研究机会正在研究。此外,我们提出了一个DSR通信模式与更传统的出版模式的相似之处,但它取代了传统的结果部分的DSR工件的描述。我们评估的DSR贡献框架和DSR通信模式,通过检查DSR范例出版物。
Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.