Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations
Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-9280.00038
复制
发表时间：
1998-05-01
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
Markson, L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bloom, P;Markson, L
什么是儿童命名代表的基础，例如当他们称衣服的雕像为“衣服的雕像”时？一种可能性是，它们仅专注于形状，将“ Clastespin”的名称扩展到形状像典型的衣服的实体。另一种可能性是，它们扩展了一个将对象引用到该对象的任何表示形式的单词，并且该形状是相关的，因为它是代表性意图的可靠指标。我们通过要求3岁和4岁的孩子描述图片来探讨这些可能性，这些图片是通过意图和类比来代表对象的图片，结果表明，孩子们对代表的欣赏是他们命名的基础。形状的相同性既不需要也不足够。我们通过考虑该帐户是否可能更普遍地适用于图形表示以外的其他文物来得出结论。
What underlies children's naming of representations, such as when they call a statue of a clothespin "a clothespin"? One possibility is that they focus exclusively on shape, extending the name "clothespin" only to entities that are shaped like typical clothespins. An alternative possibility is that they extend a word that refers to an object to any representation of that object, and that shape is relevant because it is a reliable indicator of representational intent. We explored these possibilities by asking 3- and 4-year-olds to describe pictures that represented objects through intention and analogy The results suggest that it is children's appreciation of representation that underlies their naming; sameness of shape is neither necessary nor sufficient. We conclude by considering whether this account might apply more generally to artifacts other than pictorial representations.