Engineering management of lifeline systems under earthquake risk
Engineering management of lifeline systems under earthquake risk
复制标题
地震风险下生命线系统的工程管理
DOI：
10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.248-264
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Kameda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Kameda
讨论了地震风险下生命线系统管理的研究现状。在回顾了生命线地震工程的历史概况和具体特点后，提出了生命线地震工程实践的要素。内容包括生命线保护技术的概述、最近几次城市地震特别是1995年科比地震的教训和抗震规范的发展。首先讨论了体系相互作用下的抗震可靠度，给出了体系相互作用下的抗震可靠度的一般框架和分析方法。接下来，生命线性能的标准进行了讨论，重点是量化的质量问题，特别是在实施过程中需要。在介绍了一个总体框架后，两个案例，一个是来自科比的关于水客户的反应，一个是来自加州的关于地震改善的资金程序。最后，讨论了地震工程的未来发展方向及其与生命线地震工程的关系。它强调，我们应该建立一个第三代地震工程，结构和岩土工程缓解，危机管理和可持续发展应通过多学科的发展，多学科的研究举措的一些例子介绍。
The state-of-the-art of lifeline system management under earthquake risk is discussed. After a historical overview and specific features of lifeline earthquake engineering, elements of lifeline earthquake engineering practice are presented. They include outline of lifeline protection technologies, lessons from recent urban earthquakes particularly Kobe 1995, and seismic code developments Then two topics are addressed specifically. First seismic reliability under system interaction is discussed with its general scheme and an analytical methodology. Next, criteria for lifeline performance is discussed with an emphasis on quantification of qualitative issues that are needed particularly in implementation processes. After presenting a general framework, two cases, one from Kobe on water customers' response, and one from California regarding funding procedure for seismic improvement. Finally, future orientations of earthquake engineering and its relation to lifeline earthquake engineering is addressed. It is emphasized that we should establish a third generation earthquake engineering where structural and geotechnical mitigation, crisis management, and sustainable development should be integrated through multi-disciplinary developments Some examples of multi-disciplinary research initiatives are introduced.