Upper mantle seismic anisotropy as a constraint for mantle flow and continental dynamics of the North American plate
Upper mantle seismic anisotropy as a constraint for mantle flow and continental dynamics of the North American plate
复制标题
上地幔地震各向异性作为北美板块地幔流和大陆动力学的约束
DOI:
10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.019
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
T. Becker
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wanying Wang;T. Becker
The alignment of intrinsically anisotropic olivine crystals under convection is typically invoked as the cause of the bulk of seismic anisotropy inferred from shear-wave splitting (SWS). This provides a means of constraining the interplay between continental dynamics and the deep mantle, in particular for densely instrumented regions such as North America after USArray. There, a comparison of “fast orientations” from SWS with absolute plate motions (APM) suggests that anisotropy is mainly controlled by plate motions. However, large regional misfits and the limited realism of the APM model motivate us to further explore SWS based anisotropy. If SWS is estimated from olivine alignment in mantle circulation instead, plate-driven flow alone produces anisotropy that has large misfits with SWS. The addition of large-scale mantle density anomalies and lateral viscosity variations significantly improves models. Although a strong continental craton is essential, varying its geometry does, however, not improve the plate-scale misfit. Moreover, models based on higher resolution tomography degrade the fit, indicating issues with the flow model assumptions and/or a missing contributions to anisotropy. We thus compute a “lithospheric complement” to achieve a best-fit, joint representation of asthenospheric and frozen-in lithospheric anisotropy. The complement shows coherent structure and regional correlation with independently imaged crustal and upper mantle anisotropy. Dense SWS measurements therefore provide information on depth-dependent anisotropy with implications for tectonics, but much remains to be understood about continental anisotropy and its origin.
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
M. Bodmer;D. Toomey;E. Hooft;John Náb;lek;J. Braunmiller
通讯作者:
M. Bodmer;D. Toomey;E. Hooft;John Náb;lek;J. Braunmiller
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Quan Zhou;Jiashun Hu;Lijun Liu;T. Chaparro;D. Stegman;M. Faccenda
通讯作者:
Quan Zhou;Jiashun Hu;Lijun Liu;T. Chaparro;D. Stegman;M. Faccenda