On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: 'Second Person' Reference in Multi-Party Conversation
On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: 'Second Person' Reference in Multi-Party Conversation
复制标题
论语言资源在对话互动组织中的地位：多方对话中的“第二人称”参照
DOI：
10.1075/prag.6.3.02ler
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Gene H. Lerner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gene H. Lerner
称呼一个接受者可以包括使用语法学家所描述的“第二人称”指称。在英语中，大多数情况下，这采用g的形式（及其变体，如g $）。语言学中的传统观点认为，g提供了一种指称说话者的受话人的方式。我认为，这里有一个隐含的假设，即被称呼的接受者已经或自动地确立了，因此使用你只是符合这种事态。这种假设对于双方对话来说是正确的（这可能是大多数语言学家的想法（参见Lrvinson 1988）），因为使用指称形式，指定收件人作为指称通常只指一个人-说话人的听话人-在rwo党的谈话。然而，在多方对话中，ygu的使用并不能自动解决谁被提及，因为它的使用并不能单独区分说话者的共同参与者中的被寻址接收者。因此，你一个人并不能指定谁被提到，因为它不能指定谁被寻址。
Addressing a single recipient can encompass the use of what grammarians have characterized as' second person'reference. In English, for the most part, this takes the form g (and its variants such as g $). The conventional view in linguistics holds that g provides a way to refer to the addressee of the speaker. A tacit assumption here, I think, is that the addressed recipient is already or automatically established, and so the use of you simply conforms to this state of affairs. This assumption is on the right track for rwo-party conversation (which may be what most linguists have in mind (cf. Lrvinson 1988)), since using a reference form that designates the addressee as referent will ordinarily only be referring to one person-the speaker's recipient-in rwo-party conversation. However, in multi-party conversation, the use of ygu does not automatically resolve who is being referred to, since its use does not alone distinguish an addressed recipient from among the speaker's co-participants. Thus, you alone does not speci $ who is being referred to, because it cannot speciff who is being addressed.