Estimating genotype error rates from high-coverage next-generation sequence data.

Estimating genotype error rates from high-coverage next-generation sequence data.
复制标题

从高覆盖的下一代序列数据估计基因型错误率。

DOI:
10.1101/gr.168393.113
复制
发表时间:
2014-11
期刊:
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Risch N
Risch N
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wall JD;Tang LF;Zerbe B;Kvale MN;Kwok PY;Schaefer C;Risch N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

外显子组和全基因组测序研究正变得越来越普遍,但对常用平台进行的基因型呼叫的准确性知之甚少。在这里,我们使用来自四个欧美人的血液和唾液DNA样本的重复高覆盖率测序来估计Complete Genomics和Illumina HiSeq全基因组和全外显子组测序的误差率下限。非参考基因型呼叫的错误率从0.1%到0.6%不等,这取决于平台和覆盖深度。此外,我们发现(1)血液和唾液样本之间的错误率或错误率没有差异;(2) Complete Genomics序列的错误率明显高于Illumina序列;(3)对于罕见或独特的变异,错误率更高(高达6%);(4)误差率一般随基因型质量(GQ)评分而下降,但对于Illumina数据来说是非线性的,可能是由于GQ评分大于60时失去了特异性;(5)错误率随着Illumina数据覆盖深度的增加而增加。这些发现,特别是(3)-(5)表明,在解释基于下一代测序的关联研究结果时应谨慎,在缺乏其他更强大的测序或基因分型方法验证的情况下,在该技术的临床应用中更应谨慎。
Exome and whole-genome sequencing studies are becoming increasingly common, but little is known about the accuracy of the genotype calls made by the commonly used platforms. Here we use replicate high-coverage sequencing of blood and saliva DNA samples from four European-American individuals to estimate lower bounds on the error rates of Complete Genomics and Illumina HiSeq whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing. Error rates for nonreference genotype calls range from 0.1% to 0.6%, depending on the platform and the depth of coverage. Additionally, we found (1) no difference in the error profiles or rates between blood and saliva samples; (2) Complete Genomics sequences had substantially higher error rates than Illumina sequences had; (3) error rates were higher (up to 6%) for rare or unique variants; (4) error rates generally declined with genotype quality (GQ) score, but in a nonlinear fashion for the Illumina data, likely due to loss of specificity of GQ scores greater than 60; and (5) error rates increased with increasing depth of coverage for the Illumina data. These findings, especially (3)–(5), suggest that caution should be taken in interpreting the results of next-generation sequencing-based association studies, and even more so in clinical application of this technology in the absence of validation by other more robust sequencing or genotyping methods.
来自1,092个人基因组的遗传变异的综合图。
DOI: 10.1038/nature11632
发表时间: 2012-11-01
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.1126/science.1219240
发表时间: 2012-07-06
期刊: Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Tennessen JA;Bigham AW;O'Connor TD;Fu W;Kenny EE;Gravel S;McGee S;Do R;Liu X;Jun G;Kang HM;Jordan D;Leal SM;Gabriel S;Rieder MJ;Abecasis G;Altshuler D;Nickerson DA;Boerwinkle E;Sunyaev S;Bustamante CD;Bamshad MJ;Akey JM;Broad GO;Seattle GO;NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project
通讯作者: NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr344
发表时间: 2011-07
影响因子: 14.9
作者:
Nakamura K;Oshima T;Morimoto T;Ikeda S;Yoshikawa H;Shiwa Y;Ishikawa S;Linak MC;Hirai A;Takahashi H;Altaf-Ul-Amin M;Ogasawara N;Kanaya S
通讯作者: Kanaya S
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1975
发表时间: 2011-09-25
影响因子: 46.9
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.1038/nature08250
发表时间: 2009-09-10
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
通讯作者: --