A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task

A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00221-006-0557-9
复制
发表时间:
2006-11-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Tzeng, Ovid J. -L.
Tzeng, Ovid J. -L.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tsai, Chia-Chin;Kuo, Wen-Jui;Tzeng, Ovid J. -L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们的许多行为都受到社会环境的影响。传统的方法将社会环境的影响归因于唤醒状态的社会促进方式的变化。概念运动方法假设感知事件和预期行为之间的共同编码,使用概念运动兼容性的概念方案来解释自我-他人互动。在本研究中,我们记录了在刺激-反应(S-R)相容安排下的Go/NoGo任务中的反应时间(RTs)和事件相关电位,以研究社会情境如何影响自我-他人互动。虽然社会促进理论预测,与观众一起行动比单独行动时,RTs会更快,但意念运动理论预测,只有在联合条件下,S-R兼容效应才会出现。结果显示,在关节状态下,RTs的S-R相容性、Go试验的侧化准备电位和NoGo试验的P3电位,符合思想运动理论的预测。由于对他人行为的预期,自我和他人的行为在表征层面上被内部和无意地编码,它们的功能等价可以通过感知系统和行动系统之间的共同编码框架来实现。社会促进理论不被支持,因为我们没有发现显著的数据差异取决于设置。
Many of our actions are influenced by the social context. Traditional approach attributes the influence of the social context to arousal state changes in a socially promotive way. The ideomotor approach, which postulates common coding between perceived events and intended actions, uses a conceptual scheme of ideomotor compatibility to explain self-other interaction. In this study, we recorded reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task with stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility arrangement to examine how the social context affects self-other interaction. Although the social facilitation theory predicted that RTs would be faster when acting together with audience rather than acting alone, the ideomotor theory predicted S-R compatibility effects only for the joint condition. The results revealed S-R compatibility on the RTs, lateralized readiness potential of the Go trials, and P3 of the NoGo trials in the joint condition, which were in line with the predictions of the ideomotor theory. Owing to the anticipation of other's actions, self and other's actions are internally and unintentionally coded at the representational level and their functional equivalency can be realized through a common coding framework between perception and action systems. Social facilitation theory was not supported, because we found no significant data differences depending on the setting.