The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03085149600000018
复制
发表时间：
1996-08-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Rose, N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rose, N
自世纪中期以来，社会作为思想和行动的一个层面，一直是政治思想和政治纲领的核心。本文认为，虽然社会主题以及对社会凝聚力和社会正义的关注在政治争论中仍然重要，但社会不再是政府战略的关键领域、目标和目标。全球化语言的兴起表明，经济关系不再容易被理解为是在一个单一的有界国家经济中组织起来的。社区已经成为政府的一种新的空间化：异质的、多元的，将个人、家庭和其他人联系在一起，成为相互竞争的身份和认同的文化集合体。政府主体之间的划分以新的方式进行编码;既不包括也不排除作为社会公民进行管理。专家权威的管理采用非社会策略。反政治的主题，如结社主义和社群主义，不寻求通过社会治理，在政治思想中正在上升。本文提出了一些诊断和分析这些新的政治思想和行动的地域化的方法。
The social, as a plane of thought and action, has been central to political thought and political programmes since the mid-nineteenth century. This paper argues that, while themes of society and concerns with social cohesion and social justice are still significant in political argument, the social is no longer a key zone, target and objective of strategies of government. The rise of the language of globalization indicates that economic relations are no longer easily understood as organized across a single bounded national economy. Community has become a new spatialization of government: heterogeneous, plural, linking individuals, families and others into contesting cultural assemblies of identities and allegiances. Divisions among the subjects of government are coded in new ways; neither included nor excluded are governed as social citizens. Non-social strategies are deployed for the management of expert authority. Anti-political motifs such as associationism and communitarianism which do not seek to govern through society, are on the rise in political thought. The paper suggests some ways of diagnosing and analysing these novel territorializations of political thought and action.